“I hate it when he referee us, he’s clearly got a vendetta against us.”

26 11 2013

It’s sad that when our society wants to contemplate the effect of referees on our society we leave the thinking to our less than enlightened media.

When our media considers this “issue” it’s behaviour is akin to a lecherous drunk; they’re determined to present a clear and sober version of events even though they’re clearly intoxicated (by their pursuit of viewers and readers.) Our media turns most situations in to red hot talking points even though don’t want to highlight such issues because it would “demean the sport we all love”.

Let’s take Alan Green the opinionated loudmouth as our example, on last Sunday’s Match of the Day 2 Extra he boldly stated that he really hated talking about referees and officials because it should be “about the football” yet less than twenty minutes later he was demanding that referees are interrogated in after matches interviews so they “can explain contentious decisions”. It’s no wonder the media is obsessed with teams quickly turning corners when a blatant volte-face is accepted behaviour.

When the BBC covers the issues of discipline and referees. they like to collect everything for a single easy-to-read document;

Premier League: Decisions that shaped the weekend

Questionable refereeing decisions were once again among the major talking points of a dramatic weekend in the Premier League.

Everton’s gripping draw with Liverpool, Stoke’s revitalising win against Sunderland and Cardiff’s rousing match with Premier League champions Manchester United were all influenced by debatable calls from the officials.

How did the managers, BBC Sport pundits and our readers view these incidents?

Mirallas clatters Suarez

Incident: With Liverpool leading rivals Everton 2-1 in a thrilling Merseyside derby, a thunderous knee-high challenge from Kevin Mirallas left Luis Suarez bloodied but resulted only in a booking for the Toffees winger.

With the Uruguayan laid out in pain on the floor, both sets of players surrounded Phil Dowd as they waited several minutes for the referee to finally make his contentious decision to issue a yellow card.

Mirallas went on to have a hand in Romelu Lukaku’s two goals after the interval to put Everton in charge. The home side were only denied in the 89th minute when Daniel Sturridge headed in an equaliser.

What they said:

Liverpool boss Brendan Rodgers: “Mirallas should have been sent off. It would have been interesting had Luis made that challenge. He caught him right on the back of his knee and that can end your career. It took Luis 10 or 15 minutes to recover and it was disappointing. Sometimes Luis rolls about a bit but gets up quickly, so I knew it was a reasonably bad one for him to stay down for so long.”

Everton manager Roberto Martinez: “I have seen the replay and obviously Kevin goes for the ball with a typical striker’s tackle and closes his eyes when he gets to the incident and his right leg catches Suarez. I think a yellow card, bearing in mind the emotions you bring into a derby, was the right decision. But I can see why, if that had been against my team, I would have been thinking it would have been a red card.”

Match of the Day pundit Kevin Kilbane: “Phil Dowd had a very good game, but for me, Mirallas was really, really lucky. It was a bad challenge.”

Chief football writer Phil McNulty at Goodison Park: “Mirallas is a very, very lucky boy. Phil Dowd took forever to make that decision – and got it wrong.”

Reaction on BBC live text commentary:

Alistair Lowe:  I think there are two things you can say about the booking for Mirallas. 1) it’s Suarez – known for theatrics. 2) He’s unsighted.

Peter Steele:  How is Mirrallas not off? Suarez has holes in his leg from that!

Gareth Soye:  Just how many Liverpool players and staff were advising Phil Dowd on what to do here?

Rooney kicks out

Incident: Manchester United’s match with Cardiff was barely into the eighth minute when Wayne Rooney floored Jordon Mutch with a petulant kick after he failed to dribble past his dogged opponent.

Despite the protestations of the Cardiff players, referee Neil Swarbrick decided to issue the England striker with only a booking. Their anger grew soon after when Rooney put his side ahead with a deflected strike.

In a standout performance, Rooney looked to have set up United’s winner when Patrice Evra headed them 2-1 ahead before substitute Kim Bo-Kyung stooped to nod in a 90th-minute equaliser.

What they said:

Manchester United manager David Moyes: “I think the boy runs across his path and was a bit of a tussle but I don’t think it deserved any more than a yellow card. I think there’s lashing out at times and I don’t think that was a lash out in any way.”

Cardiff manager Malky Mackay: “Well, I’ll look at it again but on first look it certainly is a real kick at him, but maybe the booking was sufficient.”

BBC Radio 5 live pundit Steve Claridge at Cardiff City Stadium: “He should have gone, he just kicked him. If the referee has seen it, and he must have as he booked him, he should have sent him off. By the letter of the law, Wayne Rooney cannot stay on the pitch.”

Match of the Day presenter Gary Lineker:  “Wayne Rooney is comfortably the best player who shouldn’t be on the pitch.”

Match of the Day 2 pundit Alan Shearer: “It was a bad tackle and it should have been a red card.”

Reaction on BBC live text commentary:

Wale Ibraheem:  I thought Rooney had matured… He is lucky to be on the pitch.

Austin Brock:  Red card for Rooney all day long… And I’m a Manchester United fan!

Alistair Wiseman:  Oh what a surprise. Should have been sent off, goes on and scores. It’s no wonder people are getting disillusioned with the game.

Brown sees red

Incident: There seemed to be little of consequence when Sunderland defender Wes Brown slid in to take the ball off Stoke goalscorer Charlie Adam just past the half-hour mark.

With both sets of players carrying on as normal, referee Kevin Friend brought a halt to the game to dismiss Brown for a one-footed challenge in which he appeared to win the ball cleanly.

Black Cats manager Gus Poyet threw off his coat and gloves in anger, while his players confronted the official. Sunderland were forced to continue with 10 men and fell to a 2-0 defeat when Steven Nzonzi supplied a cool finish after a swift breakaway near the end.

What they said:

Sunderland manager Gus Poyet: “I don’t think there is any explanation. Was it a two-footed tackle? No. Was he not in control? No. Over the ball? No. Was the opponent in danger? No. Did he make contact? No. Please explain me. It is difficult to accept.”

Stoke manager Mark Hughes: “I’m sure Gus feels a little bit aggrieved about the red card, but my interpretation of it was that maybe Wes was a little bit out of control and a little bit reckless. At the time I thought it was a poor challenge. Whether or not it merited a sending-off, that is obviously the debate after the game.”

Sunderland captain John O’Shea: “The ref’s not had the best of days, has he? Hopefully the red card will get overturned.”

Match of the Day presenter Gary Lineker: “The Wes Brown red card for Sunderland at Stoke is a bewildering decision.”

Dion Dublin on Final Score: “Absolutely nowhere near a red card. I think the referee saw the pace that Wes Brown went into it. He did not touch the player – it was a 100% fair challenge and the referee has got it 100% wrong.”

Reaction on BBC live text commentary:

Paul Rogers:  Ridiculous decision to send off Brown. Only a matter of time before tackles are outlawed.

Ricky Lee Everett:  Wes Brown is cursed – injuries ruined his United and England career and now this red card. Got to feel for him.

Matt:  Absolutely ridiculous decision from the ref, hardly caught the player at all, never a red.

And the one that didn’t…

Incident: Crystal Palace winger Yannick Bolasie was shown a straight red card after putting in a badly-timed challenge on Jake Livermore on the edge of the Hull area after he stretched to regain control of the ball.

But rather than hampering Palace’s chances, the dismissal by referee Anthony Taylor was to provide the catalyst for the strugglers, as Barry Bannan slotted home the winner just two minutes later, with incoming manager Tony Pulis watching on from the stands.

What they said:

Crystal Palace caretaker manager Keith Millen: “I’ve seen the red card and I think it’s harsh. He slips into the challenge.”

Yannick Bolasie:  “Good win today, totally deserved. Boys dug in deep, great support again from the Crystal Palace faithful and don’t worry about me, I am calm.”

Match of the Day commentator Martin Fisher: “Did he slip as he went in to make the challenge? It was a soft red card, but maybe in the letter of the law it does bring one these days.”

Dion Dublin on Final Score: “It cannot be a red card. If you are giving red cards for that nobody would be playing the game – the decision was 100% wrong.”

Reaction on BBC live text commentary:

Jake Perry:  Bolasie sent off for giving the Hull player cramp. I’ve seen it all now.

You could follow the BBC’s example but I’d rather follow the example of Andi Thomas and Alex Netherton “Stop Losing Your Sh*t Over The Uncontrollable”  As this lovely article suggests football would be more palatable if we adopted the following attitude;

“Was it a penalty? Yes, it probably was. So it goes.” “Should he have been sent off? Yes he should. One of those things.”

Our media is an irritating institution; it likes to use ITV1 to show up human adults that are overpowered by an infantile need to stamp feet and wail when they find that things aren’t precisely attuned to their tastes but then actively encourage immaturity when football needs dealing with. We desperately need a sea change towards the above attitude, we need to make more people realise the true value of football.

Apart from looking ridiculous there are several other reasons why the mentally underdeveloped are wrong to let their immaturity remain unfettered. Firstly, football is inherently unfair. If the defining characteristic of football was “fairness” we’d never have winners and John Terry and Robbie Savage wouldn’t be famous.

By highlighting the “obvious” negative effects of “bad decisions” –  they cost millions of cost and lead to people being sacked – people downplay other important variables. Tactical misjudgments, injuries, stupidity, lack of skill,  luck and misfortune are six variables that are far more likely to determine the outcome of matches and they usually have little to do with the mistakes of officials.

Besides football matches are not exercises in advanced reasoning, or logical  problems to be solved, they are a reactionary chain of unexpected, and sometimes illogical, events. Let us consider the Cardiff versus Manchester United match and the failure to send off Wayne Rooney. On the surface this should have led to a different outcome; 11 players would have been playing 10 and Rooney wouldn’t have been on the pitch to score an equaliser.

What if United’s 10 remaining players had re-organised themselves and managed to repel Cardiff? What if Cardiff’s players had become over confident and started to risk using more players in their attacks? This could have led to United taking advantage of the greater space with swift counter attacks. What if Cardiff’s goal keeper had tried a Cruyff turn, slipped and miskicked the ball straight to a United player 25 yards from an unguarded net? What if he match still ended as a 2-2 draw? What if the match was pre-destined to end as 2-2? If any of these situations had arisen would there be as many important talking points?

They should either get people to change or outlaw radio phone ins.

Referees, lest we forget.



Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: